The casinos and slots parlor that are already regulated by the state Gaming Commission were made automatically eligible for sports betting licenses here — all they had to do was submit an application and pay a fee, and the commission is required by law to issue them a license so long as they meet the law’s other requirements.
But MGM Springfield almost whiffed on its layup of a license request when it missed last week’s application deadline, Gaming Commission officials revealed Tuesday. Only after an MGM executive fell on his sword and apologized for what he said was a “miscommunication” within MGM’s corporate team did commissioners vote unanimously Tuesday to accept the casino’s application all the same.
Commission Executive Director Karen Wells said Tuesday morning that while MGM Springfield paid its $200,000 application fee by the Nov. 21 deadline, the casino didn’t actually get its completed sports betting license application to the commission until Nov. 23. MGM Springfield Vice President and Counsel Gus Kim participated in Tuesday’s meeting virtually to take the blame.
“There was a miscommunication. That is completely my fault, I apologize. I am so sorry that it happened but as soon as we realized that there was an issue, we corrected the problem,” Kim said.
Kim said MGM was juggling both the application for an in-person betting license for MGM Springfield and the BetMGM application for a mobile betting allowance and that he “inadequately communicated” to MGM’s corporate team the breakdown of who was supposed to be working on which portions of which application.
“Again, the fault was completely with me. … And it was an extraordinary circumstance where many people were doing many things at the same time,” he said, using a phrase (“extraordinary circumstances”) that appears in commission regulations as one reason regulators could allow for an extension of time to submit an application. “And so I do ask for the commissioners’ indulgence and ask that you allow our application to go forward.”
Commissioners were receptive to Kim’s request for a vote to officially authorize commission staff to process and review MGM Springfield’s late application, and regulators agreed that the casino was in a different position than an applicant competing against others for a state betting license. Wells said that in the state’s sports betting law “there’s a almost presumption of license for the three casinos.”
“So MGM Springfield is not really competing against another entity in order to receive the license. So therefore the delay of a couple of days does not impact any other party and no other party would be aggrieved,” she said.
The 15 applications that the commission got last week — from Plainridge Park Casino, MGM Springfield, Encore Boston Harbor, WynnBet, Caesars Sportsbook, BetMGM, Penn Sports Interactive, Fanatics Sportsbook, Bally Bet, bet365, Betr, Betway (DGC USA), DraftKings, FanDuel, and PointsBet — have all been transferred into the Gaming Commission’s internal system where components can be shared across commission divisions. Loretta Lillios, director of the Investigations and Enforcement Bureau, said the licensing team has now turned its attention to reviewing each application for any deficiencies.
The Gaming Commission will also meet Thursday and that meeting’s agenda suggests it will focus far more on the detailed rules and regulations for sports betting. Commissioners, their in-house lawyers and attorneys brought in from an outside firm have been working to write, edit and approve roughly 225 sets of regulations related to sports betting.