Massachusetts is now one of the most expensive states in the nation in which to own a home, with a median housing price close to $700,000. 

We have this problem, in part, because of minimum-lot-size laws, which force developers to build only large, luxury homes in order to turn a profit. Numerous studies have consistently found that large minimum-lot requirements increase home prices while reducing the number of homes that get built. 

The result is predictable. The state’s A Home for Everyone report found that young people are leaving Massachusetts at an alarming rate, with many reporting that housing costs are the main reason. In 2024 alone, Massachusetts lost nearly 30,000 working-age adults to other states. Meanwhile, older homeowners who would like to downsize often can’t find a smaller home to move into, so housing stock is not freed up for the next generation.  

On Nov. 3, voters can help solve this problem by voting “yes” on the “Legalize Starter Homes” ballot question. The proposal will enable developers to build small homes on 5,000 square-foot lots in places already served by public water and sewer. The proposal still preserves local control, including zoning limits, setbacks, building heights, and environmental protections. For example, it will not allow apartment towers in single-family neighborhoods.

This approach works. Across the country, states and municipalities that have adopted similar reforms have seen increased housing production. 

But right now, every one of the commonwealth’s 351 municipalities gets to set its own minimum lot size. Over 56% of these towns and cities require one acre to build on. Some require two- and even three-acre lots. 

That means a community can effectively say, “We don’t want affordable housing here,” even when there is demand for it and the infrastructure to support it.

When communities make that choice, the result is a statewide shortage of starter homes. The state’s Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities has estimated that we need more than 220,000 additional homes over the next decade just to keep up with demand, yet we’re falling far short of that goal.

Housing works like a chain. When seniors can downsize, they free up family homes. When young families buy starter homes, they leave apartments for others. Every move creates another opportunity.

Building more starter homes helps everyone. 

That’s why I am voting “yes” on the “Legalize Starter Homes” ballot question — and why I urge you to join me.

Sarena Neyman lives in Leverett.