White House rescinds freeze on federal grants

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks Tuesday at her first briefing at the White House. Despite Monday’s directive on federal spending being revoked, she said Tuesday that administrationefforts to restrict spending will continue.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks Tuesday at her first briefing at the White House. Despite Monday’s directive on federal spending being revoked, she said Tuesday that administrationefforts to restrict spending will continue. AP

By JEFF STEIN and TONY ROMM

The Washington Post

Published: 01-29-2025 4:21 PM

The White House budget office on Wednesday rescinded an order freezing federal grants, according to a copy of a new memo obtained by The Washington Post, after the administration’s move to halt spending earlier this week provoked a backlash.

In a memo dated Wednesday and distributed to federal agencies, Matthew J. Vaeth, acting director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, states that OMB memorandum M-25-13 “is rescinded.” That order, issued Monday, instructed federal agencies to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligations or disbursement of all federal financial assistance.”

The original White House order freezing federal grants and loan disbursements caused mass chaos and confusion across Washington and around the nation, appearing to imperil government programs that fund schools, provide housing and ensure that low-income Americans have access to health care.

States reported issues accessing funds under Medicaid, and even as of Wednesday, public housing authorities reported being locked out of their funding portal. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that assistance for individuals would not be affected.

The Trump administration withdrew the order a day after a federal judge in Washington, D.C., temporarily halted its implementation until Feb. 3, allowing public health advocates, nonprofits and businesses — represented by the group Democracy Forward — more time to challenge the directive’s legality. Congressional Democrats and legal entities harshly criticized the order Tuesday, arguing that it was a constitutional overreach by the Trump administration to block spending authorized by Congress and signed into law.

Separately, roughly two dozen state attorneys general filed their own lawsuit against the administration Tuesday, arguing that the pause in federal spending harms their citizens.

On X, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt acknowledged that the initial budget office memo has been suspended, but said the administration’s broader efforts to block spending it opposes remain in effect. Other executive orders approved by President Donald Trump but not rescinded — including a pause on foreign aid and on some clean energy funds approved by the Biden administration — appear to still be in effect, budget experts said.

Leavitt said the order was rescinded to make it clear that the administration will comply with the federal order pausing the freeze.

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

20 dispensaries statewide found to have products with mold, including in Pioneer Valley
St. Mary’s project faces skepticism at Northampton Planning Board meeting
River Valley Co-op denies Jewish Voice for Peace request to set up info table at Northampton, Easthampton stores
Change on march in sleepy Florence: New developments stir optimism, worries
Amherst town worker hired to take minutes says council violating Open Meeting Law
Weed grower suing neighbor Nourse Farms for $17M over pesticide drift that ruined crops

“This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo,” Leavitt posted. “Why? To end any confusion created by the court’s injunction. The president’s EO’s on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.”

The rescinded order reflects what is likely to be just one of many initial battles over the Trump administration’s attempts to assert far more control over the federal budget. President Trump and Russell Vought, his nominee to head the OMB still awaiting Senate confirmation, have maintained that the executive branch should have far more discretion to cancel federal spending without congressional approval.

“While this is extremely welcome news, it only stops those illegal” pauses in government funding approved by the budget office’s funding freeze, said Bobby Kogan, a former Biden administration official at the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank.

Vought and Mark Paoletta, tapped as an attorney for the White House budget office, have said the administration will challenge a 1974 budget law that limits presidential authority to cancel spending. Paoletta has asserted that the law is “unconstitutional,” arguing it reverses presidential authority to cancel federal funds that dates back to the nation’s founding.